Environment - Capping-and-Trading Carbon Credits



Both the private sector and the U.S. Congress are working from opposite on the same scheme that is supposed to stop and hopefully reverse global warming - the "cap-and-trade" system of "carbon credits."

This is how the scheme works:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is known to be the number one polluter of our atmosphere and thus number one culprit in global warming. Private companies, and especially utility companies that produce energy through fossil fuels like coal, are among the top producers of CO2. And right now there is no limit to the amount of CO2 that such companies can produce.

Thus, someone suggested to create an artificial "scarcity" of CO2, which would be a very good thing.

How do you do that? By passing a law to limit the amount of CO2 that each company can produce.

But what if a company produces LESS than it's allowed amount? Or what if another company needs to produce MORE carbon dioxide for various reasons?

Then the company that is below its "carbon emission quota" can sell that "right to pollute" on the open market to the company that needs to emit more carbon into the atmosphere. Thus, such "carbon permits" can be sold and bought just like regular stocks in the stock market.

The cap-and-trade system is already in use in Europe at this writing (March 2007) and the prices of such permits tripled within the last two years.

An increasing number of giant corporations in the U.S. are now endorsing the cap-and-trade system thinking they need to be at the table when the nature and amount of caps are decided. I think they are being very smart. You either have a role in determining the rules of the cap-and-trade game or you live by its ramifications. You are either sitting at the steering wheel of this cap-and-trade juggernaut or you are going to get hit by it.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Comments: [0] / Post comment:
07 Oct 2008 05:18:37

Candidate advisers debate carbon capture funds - Reuters

Candidate advisers debate carbon capture funds Reuters - An cost-effective way to retrofit power stations to trap and store carbon dioxide rather than releasing it into the atmosphere, would be "the most important ...
07 Oct 2008 04:35:13

UK urged to cut carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 - Reuters UK

Reuters UK urged to cut carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 Reuters UK, UK - The new goal would also apply to all the main manmade greenhouse gases rather than just carbon dioxide, under the present target, the CCC Chair Adair Turner ... UK must cut greenhouse gases by 80 per cent, says Committee End use of fossil fuels in 20 years, UK warned Westminster 'set to beat Holyrood' on climate change pledges
06 Oct 2008 23:50:55

NW could lead US on non-carbon energy, report says - Seattle Post Intelligencer

NW could lead US on non- carbon energy, report says Seattle Post Intelligencer - The report is called " Carbon -Free Prosperity 2025: How the Northwest can create green jobs, deliver clean energy and thrive in the global clean-tech ... Study: Green-tech could create 63000 Oregon jobs New Study Finds That Clean-Energy Industry Can Power Northwest ... Pacific Northwest Should Target Cleantech, Says Study -

Keywords: