Is the Global Warming Conclusion Correct?

Perhaps you have heard all the debates over Global Warming and well so have we at the World Think Tank so we watched the movie by Al Gore; Inconvenient Truth and we read Michael Creighton's new book and 44 research papers. We dug through the information and a couple of our members indeed are in full support of the Global Warming Alarmist's views. One member in full battle gear told the Global Alarmists;

"Your conclusion is incorrect, in that no relevant research has discussed the over all affect of converging Earth, Space, Atmospheric and Solar Cycles or proven that these normal cycles have not come and gone thousands if not millions of times before, likewise the earth is 4.5-5.5 Billion Years old and to think that it would have a calamity on our briefness in time here that would kill all living life is preposterous, otherwise we would have never had the time to evolve."

What is he saying here? Well he is stating that these theories and research are garbage in, garbage out and do not pass the smell test. That is what he am saying. Additionally he is saying it is exactly opposite of what the alarmist's say and that the Global Warming Alarmists will not listen to anything anyone else says or accept any data or alternative explanation for the moderate ambient temperature increases.

Further he is saying that the Global Warming Alarmists do not have enough data to make such bold comments. The question is who is right and who is wrong? Is Global Warming humankind's death song or will this problem all blow away soon and everyone will have to admit that they were wrong?

I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your quest to be the best in 2007. I thank you for reading my many articles on diverse subjects, which interest you.

Keywords: